Developers are testing their own work
Self-testing misses assumptions. An independent pass looks at the release the way a customer would.
QA & Release Assurance
Independent QA for agencies, SaaS teams and growing software companies that need release confidence without adding full-time QA headcount.
Who this is for
Self-testing misses assumptions. An independent pass looks at the release the way a customer would.
Acceptance testing squeezed between other duties usually covers the happy path only.
Release confidence is needed now, before a full-time quality engineer joins the team.
Overlapping delivery dates leave little room for structured regression coverage.
Larger change means larger regression risk across journeys that used to be stable.
An external report and evidence trail makes sign-off easier to defend.
Productised service
A scoped QA engagement around one release — not a subscription tool. Scope stays as small as it can be while still covering the journeys that carry real risk.
Process
Share the staging URL, requirements, credentials and the target release date.
Identify the highest-risk journeys and the acceptance criteria that matter for this release.
Execute testing and document defects with clear evidence and severity.
Verify fixes and provide a release-readiness outcome you can act on.
Capability
TS Haus is founder-led. The QA work is delivered directly by Shane Hau, drawing on 5+ years of software QA and product delivery experience across web and mobile testing, automation, API testing, performance and load testing, UAT, release management and QA leadership.
Selenium and Robot Framework experience for repeatable browser regression coverage.
Appium and Airtest experience for mobile application and device behaviour testing.
Postman and Apifox experience, including connected API-flow validation across services.
Locust and load-testing experience to observe behaviour under expected traffic.
Test strategy, UAT, regression planning, risk assessment and release readiness.
How AI fits in
AI and automation may be used to speed up requirement analysis, test planning, regression preparation and evidence summarisation so more time goes into testing the risky paths.
Defect severity, risk judgement and the release-readiness decision stay human. No automated verdict decides whether your release is safe to ship.
Send the staging build, current risk and timeline. We’ll scope the smallest useful QA engagement.